- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ad5621e
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-10-19 00:19 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-10-19 11:19 UTC by FMail PING bot, 2:291/0
- Robot
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5001/100→+1s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-59m2:291/111
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5001/100 |
2026-10-19 00:19 UTC |
– |
FidoMail v0.1.5 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-10-19 00:19 UTC |
+1s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-19 02:21 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-19 01:24 UTC |
+1h 4m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
| 5 |
2:291/111 |
2026-10-19 00:24 UTC |
-59m |
FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0 |
Raw Via lines
2:5001/100@fidonet @20261019.001942.UTC FidoMail v0.1.5
2:5020/715 @20261019.001943.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20261019.022113 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261019.012400.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
2:291/111 @20261019.002443.294.UTC FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
2:291/0→+10h 51m2:240/1120→2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:291/0 |
2026-10-19 00:24 UTC |
– |
FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0 |
| 2 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-10-19 11:16 UTC |
+10h 51m |
Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190 |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-19 13:19 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
Raw Via lines
2:291/0 @20261019.002443.372.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
2:240/1120@FidoNet @20261019.111608.70.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
2:292/854 @20261019.131914 D'Bridge 4
- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ac2eaca
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-10-05 00:09 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-10-05 00:35 UTC by FMail PING bot, 2:291/0
- Robot
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5001/100→+1s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-58m2:291/111
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5001/100 |
2026-10-05 00:09 UTC |
– |
FidoMail d6aaa2b3 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-10-05 00:09 UTC |
+1s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 02:11 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 01:13 UTC |
+1h 4m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
| 5 |
2:291/111 |
2026-10-05 00:15 UTC |
-58m |
FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0 |
Raw Via lines
2:5001/100@fidonet @20261005.000943.UTC FidoMail d6aaa2b3
2:5020/715 @20261005.000944.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20261005.021107 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261005.011359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
2:291/111 @20261005.001507.797.UTC FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
2:291/0→+10m2:240/1120→+16s2:240/1120→2:292/854→+1h 7m2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:291/0 |
2026-10-05 00:15 UTC |
– |
FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0 |
| 2 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-10-05 00:26 UTC |
+10m |
NMUPD 1.40 20120901 |
| 3 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-10-05 00:26 UTC |
+16s |
Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 02:31 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 5 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 01:34 UTC |
+1h 7m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
Raw Via lines
2:291/0 @20261005.001507.844.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
2:240/1120 @20261005.022600.56.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
2:240/1120@FidoNet @20261005.002616.92.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
2:292/854 @20261005.023108 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261005.013400.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ab074e5
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-09-21 00:05 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-09-21 00:19 UTC by FMail PING bot, 2:291/0
- Robot
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5001/100→+2s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854→-59m2:291/111
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5001/100 |
2026-09-21 00:05 UTC |
– |
FidoMail 97f43bf5 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-09-21 00:05 UTC |
+2s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 02:06 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 01:08 UTC |
+1h 3m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
| 5 |
2:291/111 |
2026-09-21 00:09 UTC |
-59m |
FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0 |
Raw Via lines
2:5001/100@fidonet @20260921.000553.UTC FidoMail 97f43bf5
2:5020/715 @20260921.000555.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20260921.020615 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.010859.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
2:291/111 @20260921.000925.564.UTC FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
2:291/0→+5m2:240/1120→+10s2:240/1120→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:291/0 |
2026-09-21 00:09 UTC |
– |
FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0 |
| 2 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-09-21 00:15 UTC |
+5m |
NMUPD 1.40 20120901 |
| 3 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-09-21 00:15 UTC |
+10s |
Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 02:16 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 5 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 01:18 UTC |
+1h 3m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
Raw Via lines
2:291/0 @20260921.000925.611.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
2:240/1120 @20260921.021500.68.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
2:240/1120@FidoNet @20260921.001510.35.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
2:292/854 @20260921.021613 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.011859.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6a9dfe78
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-09-06 23:59 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-09-07 00:14 UTC by FMail PING bot, 2:291/0
- Robot
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-59m2:291/111
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-09-06 23:59 UTC |
– |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 2 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-07 02:01 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-07 01:03 UTC |
+1h 4m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
| 4 |
2:291/111 |
2026-09-07 00:04 UTC |
-59m |
FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0 |
Raw Via lines
2:5020/715 @20260906.235949.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20260907.020111 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.010359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
2:291/111 @20260907.000453.451.UTC FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
2:291/0→+6m2:240/1120→+9s2:240/1120→2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:291/0 |
2026-09-07 00:04 UTC |
– |
FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0 |
| 2 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-09-07 00:11 UTC |
+6m |
NMUPD 1.40 20120901 |
| 3 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-09-07 00:11 UTC |
+9s |
Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-07 02:14 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
Raw Via lines
2:291/0 @20260907.000453.514.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
2:240/1120 @20260907.021100.33.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
2:240/1120@FidoNet @20260907.001109.99.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
2:292/854 @20260907.021409 D'Bridge 4
Evidence
Replies
Every netmail that came back about a ping to 2:291/0, newest first, as the sending node received it. Pongs and transit notices are matched to the ping they answer.
Path quoted in this reply
2:5001/100→+1s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-59m2:291/111
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:291/0 @20261019.002443.372.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
- 2:240/1120@FidoNet @20261019.111608.70.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
- 2:292/854 @20261019.131914 D'Bridge 4
Software
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0 --- FidoMail v0.1.5
Path quoted in this reply
2:5001/100→+1s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-58m2:291/111
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:291/0 @20261005.001507.844.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
- 2:240/1120 @20261005.022600.56.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
- 2:240/1120@FidoNet @20261005.002616.92.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
- 2:292/854 @20261005.023108 D'Bridge 4
- 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261005.013400.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
Software
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0 --- FidoMail v0.1.4-211-gd6aaa2b3
Path quoted in this reply
2:5001/100→+2s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854→-59m2:291/111
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:291/0 @20260921.000925.611.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
- 2:240/1120 @20260921.021500.68.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
- 2:240/1120@FidoNet @20260921.001510.35.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
- 2:292/854 @20260921.021613 D'Bridge 4
- 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.011859.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
Software
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0 --- FidoMail v0.1.4-122-g97f43bf5
Path quoted in this reply
2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-59m2:291/111
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:291/0 @20260907.000453.514.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
- 2:240/1120 @20260907.021100.33.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
- 2:240/1120@FidoNet @20260907.001109.99.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
- 2:292/854 @20260907.021409 D'Bridge 4
Software
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0 --- FidoMail v0.1.4-20-g980f7aa