- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ad56220
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-10-19 00:19 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-10-19 11:19 UTC by FMail PING bot, 2:291/111
- Robot
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5001/100→+2s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-59m2:291/111
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5001/100 |
2026-10-19 00:19 UTC |
– |
FidoMail v0.1.5 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-10-19 00:19 UTC |
+2s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-19 02:21 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-19 01:24 UTC |
+1h 4m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
| 5 |
2:291/111 |
2026-10-19 00:24 UTC |
-59m |
FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0 |
Raw Via lines
2:5001/100@fidonet @20261019.001942.UTC FidoMail v0.1.5
2:5020/715 @20261019.001944.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20261019.022113 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261019.012400.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
2:291/111 @20261019.002443.310.UTC FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
2:291/111→+10h 51m2:240/1120→2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:291/111 |
2026-10-19 00:24 UTC |
– |
FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0 |
| 2 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-10-19 11:16 UTC |
+10h 51m |
Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190 |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-19 13:19 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
Raw Via lines
2:291/111 @20261019.002443.372.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
2:240/1120@FidoNet @20261019.111608.75.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
2:292/854 @20261019.131914 D'Bridge 4
- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ac2ed1f
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-10-05 00:19 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-10-05 00:39 UTC by FMail PING bot, 2:291/111
- Robot
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5001/100→+2s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-58m2:291/111
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5001/100 |
2026-10-05 00:19 UTC |
– |
FidoMail d6aaa2b3 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-10-05 00:19 UTC |
+2s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 02:21 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 01:23 UTC |
+1h 4m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
| 5 |
2:291/111 |
2026-10-05 00:25 UTC |
-58m |
FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0 |
Raw Via lines
2:5001/100@fidonet @20261005.001942.UTC FidoMail d6aaa2b3
2:5020/715 @20261005.001944.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20261005.022105 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261005.012359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
2:291/111 @20261005.002508.917.UTC FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
2:291/111→+7m2:240/1120→+11s2:240/1120→2:292/854→+1h 5m2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:291/111 |
2026-10-05 00:25 UTC |
– |
FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0 |
| 2 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-10-05 00:33 UTC |
+7m |
NMUPD 1.40 20120901 |
| 3 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-10-05 00:33 UTC |
+11s |
Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 02:36 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 5 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 01:39 UTC |
+1h 5m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
Raw Via lines
2:291/111 @20261005.002508.986.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
2:240/1120 @20261005.023300.68.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
2:240/1120@FidoNet @20261005.003311.61.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
2:292/854 @20261005.023603 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261005.013900.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ab0773b
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-09-21 00:15 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-09-21 00:34 UTC by FMail PING bot, 2:291/111
- Robot
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5001/100→+2s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854→-59m2:291/111
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5001/100 |
2026-09-21 00:15 UTC |
– |
FidoMail 97f43bf5 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-09-21 00:15 UTC |
+2s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 02:16 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 01:18 UTC |
+1h 3m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
| 5 |
2:291/111 |
2026-09-21 00:19 UTC |
-59m |
FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0 |
Raw Via lines
2:5001/100@fidonet @20260921.001553.UTC FidoMail 97f43bf5
2:5020/715 @20260921.001555.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20260921.021613 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.011859.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
2:291/111 @20260921.001926.644.UTC FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
2:291/111→+8m2:240/1120→+10s2:240/1120→2:292/854→+1h 5m2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:291/111 |
2026-09-21 00:19 UTC |
– |
FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0 |
| 2 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-09-21 00:28 UTC |
+8m |
NMUPD 1.40 20120901 |
| 3 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-09-21 00:28 UTC |
+10s |
Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 02:31 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 5 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 01:33 UTC |
+1h 5m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
Raw Via lines
2:291/111 @20260921.001926.707.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
2:240/1120 @20260921.022800.40.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
2:240/1120@FidoNet @20260921.002810.84.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
2:292/854 @20260921.023112 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.013359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6a9e00ce
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-09-07 00:09 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-09-07 00:24 UTC by FMail PING bot, 2:291/111
- Robot
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-59m2:291/111
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-09-07 00:09 UTC |
– |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 2 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-07 02:11 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-07 01:13 UTC |
+1h 4m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
| 4 |
2:291/111 |
2026-09-07 00:14 UTC |
-59m |
FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0 |
Raw Via lines
2:5020/715 @20260907.000949.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20260907.021109 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.011359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
2:291/111 @20260907.001454.498.UTC FMail-W32(Toss) 2.3.1.0
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
2:291/111→+8m2:240/1120→+9s2:240/1120→2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:291/111 |
2026-09-07 00:14 UTC |
– |
FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0 |
| 2 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-09-07 00:23 UTC |
+8m |
NMUPD 1.40 20120901 |
| 3 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-09-07 00:23 UTC |
+9s |
Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-07 02:24 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
Raw Via lines
2:291/111 @20260907.001454.561.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
2:240/1120 @20260907.022300.35.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
2:240/1120@FidoNet @20260907.002309.08.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
2:292/854 @20260907.022411 D'Bridge 4
Evidence
Replies
Every netmail that came back about a ping to 2:291/111, newest first, as the sending node received it. Pongs and transit notices are matched to the ping they answer.
Path quoted in this reply
2:5001/100→+2s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-59m2:291/111
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:291/111 @20261019.002443.372.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
- 2:240/1120@FidoNet @20261019.111608.75.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
- 2:292/854 @20261019.131914 D'Bridge 4
Software
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0 --- FidoMail v0.1.5
Path quoted in this reply
2:5001/100→+2s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-58m2:291/111
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:291/111 @20261005.002508.986.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
- 2:240/1120 @20261005.023300.68.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
- 2:240/1120@FidoNet @20261005.003311.61.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
- 2:292/854 @20261005.023603 D'Bridge 4
- 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261005.013900.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
Software
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0 --- FidoMail v0.1.4-211-gd6aaa2b3
Path quoted in this reply
2:5001/100→+2s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854→-59m2:291/111
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:291/111 @20260921.001926.707.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
- 2:240/1120 @20260921.022800.40.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
- 2:240/1120@FidoNet @20260921.002810.84.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
- 2:292/854 @20260921.023112 D'Bridge 4
- 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.013359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
Software
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0 --- FidoMail v0.1.4-122-g97f43bf5
Path quoted in this reply
2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-59m2:291/111
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:291/111 @20260907.001454.561.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 2.3.1.0
- 2:240/1120 @20260907.022300.35.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
- 2:240/1120@FidoNet @20260907.002309.08.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
- 2:292/854 @20260907.022411 D'Bridge 4
Software
FMail-W32 2.3.1.0 --- FidoMail v0.1.4-20-g980f7aa