NodelistDB

Netmail PING — 2:292/854

Every FTS-4010 PING sent to 2:292/854 (fidonet), with the path each one walked.

← All PING/TRACE nodes Node history for 2:292/854

Routed ping · 2026-10-19 00:29 UTC

Answered in 8h 8m

The robot at 2:292/854 bounced it back 8h 8m after it left 2:5001/100.

Answered
MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ad56476
First hop
2:292/854@fidonet (direct)
Handed over
2026-10-19 00:29 UTC
Answered
2026-10-19 08:37 UTC by The Lord of the Pings, 2:292/854

Outbound path

The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.

2:5001/100→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854
#NodeStampedElapsedSoftware
1 2:5001/100 2026-10-19 00:29 UTC – FidoMail v0.1.5
2 2:292/854 2026-10-19 02:31 local – D'Bridge 4
3 2:292/854 2026-10-19 01:34 UTC +1h 4m O/T-Track+ 2.85
Raw Via lines 
2:5001/100@fidonet @20261019.002942.UTC FidoMail v0.1.5
2:292/854 @20261019.023114 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261019.013400.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

Return path

The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account of the trip rather than a verified route.

2:292/854
#NodeStampedElapsedSoftware
1 2:292/854 2026-10-19 09:37 UTC – O/T-Track+ 2.85
Raw Via lines 
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261019.093704.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

Routed ping · 2026-10-05 00:29 UTC

Answered in 8h 27m

The robot at 2:292/854 bounced it back 8h 27m after it left 2:5001/100.

Answered
MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ac2ef76
First hop
2:292/854@fidonet (direct)
Handed over
2026-10-05 00:29 UTC
Answered
2026-10-05 08:57 UTC by The Lord of the Pings, 2:292/854

Outbound path

The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.

2:5001/100→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854
#NodeStampedElapsedSoftware
1 2:5001/100 2026-10-05 00:29 UTC – FidoMail d6aaa2b3
2 2:292/854 2026-10-05 02:31 local – D'Bridge 4
3 2:292/854 2026-10-05 01:34 UTC +1h 4m O/T-Track+ 2.85
Raw Via lines 
2:5001/100@fidonet @20261005.002942.UTC FidoMail d6aaa2b3
2:292/854 @20261005.023108 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261005.013400.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

Return path

The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account of the trip rather than a verified route.

2:292/854
#NodeStampedElapsedSoftware
1 2:292/854 2026-10-05 09:56 UTC – O/T-Track+ 2.85
Raw Via lines 
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261005.095644.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

Routed ping · 2026-09-21 00:25 UTC

Answered in 8h 20m

The robot at 2:292/854 bounced it back 8h 20m after it left 2:5001/100.

Answered
MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ab07991
First hop
2:292/854@fidonet (direct)
Handed over
2026-09-21 00:25 UTC
Answered
2026-09-21 08:46 UTC by The Lord of the Pings, 2:292/854

Outbound path

The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.

2:5001/100→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854
#NodeStampedElapsedSoftware
1 2:5001/100 2026-09-21 00:25 UTC – FidoMail 97f43bf5
2 2:292/854 2026-09-21 02:26 local – D'Bridge 4
3 2:292/854 2026-09-21 01:28 UTC +1h 3m O/T-Track+ 2.85
Raw Via lines 
2:5001/100@fidonet @20260921.002553.UTC FidoMail 97f43bf5
2:292/854 @20260921.022616 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.012859.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

Return path

The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account of the trip rather than a verified route.

2:292/854
#NodeStampedElapsedSoftware
1 2:292/854 2026-09-21 09:46 UTC – O/T-Track+ 2.85
Raw Via lines 
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.094637.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

Routed ping · 2026-09-07 00:19 UTC

Answered in 7h 56m

The robot at 2:292/854 bounced it back 7h 56m after it left 2:5001/100.

Answered
MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6a9e0324
First hop
2:292/854@fidonet (direct)
Handed over
2026-09-07 00:19 UTC
Answered
2026-09-07 08:15 UTC by Ward Dossche, 2:292/854

Outbound path

The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.

2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854
#NodeStampedElapsedSoftware
1 2:5020/715 2026-09-06 23:39 UTC – RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2 2:292/854 2026-09-07 01:41 local – D'Bridge 4
3 2:292/854 2026-09-07 00:43 UTC +1h 4m O/T-Track+ 2.85
Raw Via lines 
2:5020/715 @20260906.233949.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20260907.014111 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.004359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

Return path

The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account of the trip rather than a verified route.

2:292/854
#NodeStampedElapsedSoftware
1 2:292/854 2026-09-07 09:15 UTC – O/T-Track+ 2.85
Raw Via lines 
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.091510.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

Evidence

Replies

Every netmail that came back about a ping to 2:292/854, newest first, as the sending node received it. Pongs and transit notices are matched to the ping they answer.

2026-10-19 08:37 UTC

pong PONG

From The Lord of the Pings, 2:292/854 · answers 2:5001/100@fidonet 6ad56476

Path quoted in this reply

2:5001/100→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854

This reply's own Via lines

  • 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261019.093704.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

2026-10-05 08:57 UTC

pong PONG

From The Lord of the Pings, 2:292/854 · answers 2:5001/100@fidonet 6ac2ef76

Path quoted in this reply

2:5001/100→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854

This reply's own Via lines

  • 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261005.095644.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

2026-09-21 08:46 UTC

pong PONG

From The Lord of the Pings, 2:292/854 · answers 2:5001/100@fidonet 6ab07991

Path quoted in this reply

2:5001/100→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854

This reply's own Via lines

  • 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.094637.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

2026-09-07 08:15 UTC

pong PONG

From Ward Dossche, 2:292/854 · answers 2:5001/100@fidonet 6a9e0324

Path quoted in this reply

2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854

This reply's own Via lines

  • 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.091510.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

2026-09-07 08:15 UTC

pong PONG

From Ward Dossche, 2:292/854 · answers 2:5001/100@fidonet 6a9e0324

Path quoted in this reply

2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854

This reply's own Via lines

  • 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.091510.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

2026-09-07 08:15 UTC

pong PONG

From Ward Dossche, 2:292/854 · answers 2:5001/100@fidonet 6a9e0324

Path quoted in this reply

2:292/854

This reply's own Via lines

  • 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.091510.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85

2026-09-07 08:15 UTC

pong PONG

From Ward Dossche, 2:292/854 · answers 2:5001/100@fidonet 6a9e0324

Path quoted in this reply

2:292/854

This reply's own Via lines

  • 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.091510.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85