- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ad574e0
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-10-19 01:39 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-10-19 11:32 UTC by PING Robot, 2:550/0
- Transit notices
- 1
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5001/100→+2s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→+8h 47m2:240/1120
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5001/100 |
2026-10-19 01:39 UTC |
– |
FidoMail 65fd0ae9 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-10-19 01:39 UTC |
+2s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-19 03:41 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-19 02:44 UTC |
+1h 4m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
| 5 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-10-19 11:31 UTC |
+8h 47m |
Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190 |
Raw Via lines
2:5001/100@fidonet @20261019.013942.UTC FidoMail 65fd0ae9
2:5020/715 @20261019.013944.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20261019.034116 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261019.024400.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
2:240/1120@FidoNet @20261019.113109.91.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
2:550/278→+44s2:5020/715
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:550/278 |
2026-10-19 11:32 UTC |
– |
hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-10-19 11:32 UTC |
+44s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
Raw Via lines
2:550/278 @20261019.113212.UTC hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24
2:5020/715 @20261019.113256.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ac2ffde
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-10-05 01:39 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-10-05 01:54 UTC by PING Robot, 2:550/0
- Transit notices
- 1
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5001/100→+1s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-53m2:240/1120→+26s2:240/1120
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5001/100 |
2026-10-05 01:39 UTC |
– |
FidoMail d6aaa2b3 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-10-05 01:39 UTC |
+1s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 03:41 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 02:43 UTC |
+1h 4m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
| 5 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-10-05 01:50 UTC |
-53m |
NMUPD 1.40 20120901 |
| 6 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-10-05 01:50 UTC |
+26s |
Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190 |
Raw Via lines
2:5001/100@fidonet @20261005.013942.UTC FidoMail d6aaa2b3
2:5020/715 @20261005.013943.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20261005.034107 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261005.024359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
2:240/1120 @20261005.035000.52.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
2:240/1120@FidoNet @20261005.015026.94.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
2:550/278→+3m2:5020/715
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:550/278 |
2026-10-05 01:51 UTC |
– |
hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-10-05 01:54 UTC |
+3m |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
Raw Via lines
2:550/278 @20261005.015126.UTC hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24
2:5020/715 @20261005.015441.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ab089f9
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-09-21 01:35 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-09-21 01:50 UTC by PING Robot, 2:550/0
- Transit notices
- 1
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5001/100→+1s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854→-57m2:240/1120→+6s2:240/1120
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5001/100 |
2026-09-21 01:35 UTC |
– |
FidoMail 97f43bf5 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-09-21 01:35 UTC |
+1s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 03:36 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 02:39 UTC |
+1h 3m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
| 5 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-09-21 01:42 UTC |
-57m |
NMUPD 1.40 20120901 |
| 6 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-09-21 01:42 UTC |
+6s |
Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190 |
Raw Via lines
2:5001/100@fidonet @20260921.013553.UTC FidoMail 97f43bf5
2:5020/715 @20260921.013554.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20260921.033613 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.023900.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
2:240/1120 @20260921.034200.31.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
2:240/1120@FidoNet @20260921.014206.40.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
2:550/278→+7m2:5020/715
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:550/278 |
2026-09-21 01:42 UTC |
– |
hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-09-21 01:50 UTC |
+7m |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
Raw Via lines
2:550/278 @20260921.014248.UTC hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24
2:5020/715 @20260921.015012.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6a9e10b2
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-09-07 01:17 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-09-07 01:31 UTC by PING Robot, 2:550/0
- Transit notices
- 1
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 6m2:292/854→-55m2:240/1120→+12s2:240/1120
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-09-07 01:17 UTC |
– |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 2 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-07 03:21 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-07 02:23 UTC |
+1h 6m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
| 4 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-09-07 01:28 UTC |
-55m |
NMUPD 1.40 20120901 |
| 5 |
2:240/1120 |
2026-09-07 01:28 UTC |
+12s |
Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190 |
Raw Via lines
2:5020/715 @20260907.011739.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20260907.032111 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.022359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
2:240/1120 @20260907.032800.39.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
2:240/1120@FidoNet @20260907.012812.08.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
2:550/278→+3m2:5020/715
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:550/278 |
2026-09-07 01:28 UTC |
– |
hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-09-07 01:31 UTC |
+3m |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
Raw Via lines
2:550/278 @20260907.012844.UTC hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24
2:5020/715 @20260907.013145.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
Evidence
Replies
Every netmail that came back about a ping to 2:550/0, newest first, as the sending node received it. Pongs and transit notices are matched to the ping they answer.
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:5001/100@fidonet @20261019.013942.UTC FidoMail 65fd0ae9
- 2:5020/715 @20261019.013944.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
- 2:292/854 @20261019.034116 D'Bridge 4
- 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261019.024400.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
- 2:240/1120@FidoNet @20261019.113109.91.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
- 2:292/854 @20261019.133606 D'Bridge 4
Software
ITR+ 2.0 FP000190 --- FidoMail v0.1.5-2-g65fd0ae9
Path quoted in this reply
2:5001/100→+2s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→+8h 47m2:240/1120
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:550/278 @20261019.113212.UTC hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24
- 2:5020/715 @20261019.113256.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:5001/100@fidonet @20261005.013942.UTC FidoMail d6aaa2b3
- 2:5020/715 @20261005.013943.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
- 2:292/854 @20261005.034107 D'Bridge 4
- 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261005.024359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
- 2:240/1120 @20261005.035000.52.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
- 2:240/1120@FidoNet @20261005.015026.94.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
- 2:292/854 @20261005.035607 D'Bridge 4
Software
ITR+ 2.0 FP000190 --- FidoMail v0.1.4-211-gd6aaa2b3
Path quoted in this reply
2:5001/100→+1s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854→-53m2:240/1120→+26s2:240/1120
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:550/278 @20261005.015126.UTC hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24
- 2:5020/715 @20261005.015441.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
Path quoted in this reply
2:5001/100→+1s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854→-57m2:240/1120→+6s2:240/1120
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:550/278 @20260921.014248.UTC hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24
- 2:5020/715 @20260921.015012.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:5001/100@fidonet @20260921.013553.UTC FidoMail 97f43bf5
- 2:5020/715 @20260921.013554.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
- 2:292/854 @20260921.033613 D'Bridge 4
- 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.023900.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
- 2:240/1120 @20260921.034200.31.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
- 2:240/1120@FidoNet @20260921.014206.35.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
- 2:292/854 @20260921.034612 D'Bridge 4
Software
ITR+ 2.0 FP000190 --- FidoMail v0.1.4-122-g97f43bf5
Path quoted in this reply
2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 6m2:292/854→-55m2:240/1120→+12s2:240/1120
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:550/278 @20260907.012844.UTC hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24
- 2:5020/715 @20260907.013145.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
This reply's own Via lines
- 2:5020/715 @20260907.011739.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
- 2:292/854 @20260907.032111 D'Bridge 4
- 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.022359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
- 2:240/1120 @20260907.032800.39.UTC+0200 NMUPD 1.40 20120901
- 2:240/1120@FidoNet @20260907.012812.08.UTC Itrack+ 2.0 FP000190
- 2:292/854 @20260907.032910 D'Bridge 4
Software
ITR+ 2.0 FP000190 --- FidoMail v0.1.4-23-ga499114