- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ad57e43
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-10-19 02:19 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-10-19 02:29 UTC by SBBSecho, 4:902/26
- Robot
SBBSecho 3.38-Linux master/22cbda6be5 sep 30 2026 GCC 12.2.0
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5001/100→+1s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5001/100 |
2026-10-19 02:19 UTC |
– |
FidoMail 65fd0ae9 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-10-19 02:19 UTC |
+1s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-19 04:21 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-19 03:23 UTC |
+1h 4m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
Raw Via lines
2:5001/100@fidonet @20261019.021943.UTC FidoMail 65fd0ae9
2:5020/715 @20261019.021944.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20261019.042109 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261019.032359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
4:902/26→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
4:902/26 |
2026-10-19 02:24 UTC |
– |
SBBSecho 3.38-Linux master/22cbda6be5 |
| 2 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-19 04:26 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-19 03:28 UTC |
+1h 4m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
Raw Via lines
4:902/26 @20261019.022453.UTC SBBSecho 3.38-Linux master/22cbda6be5
2:292/854 @20261019.042606 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261019.032859.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ac306eb
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-10-05 02:09 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-10-05 02:20 UTC by SBBSecho, 4:902/26
- Robot
SBBSecho 3.38-Linux master/22cbda6be5 sep 30 2026 GCC 12.2.0
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5001/100→+1s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5001/100 |
2026-10-05 02:09 UTC |
– |
FidoMail d6aaa2b3 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-10-05 02:09 UTC |
+1s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 04:11 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 03:14 UTC |
+1h 4m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
Raw Via lines
2:5001/100@fidonet @20261005.020943.UTC FidoMail d6aaa2b3
2:5020/715 @20261005.020944.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20261005.041107 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261005.031400.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
4:902/26→2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
4:902/26 |
2026-10-05 02:15 UTC |
– |
SBBSecho 3.38-Linux master/22cbda6be5 |
| 2 |
2:292/854 |
2026-10-05 04:19 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
Raw Via lines
4:902/26 @20261005.021516.UTC SBBSecho 3.38-Linux master/22cbda6be5
2:292/854 @20261005.041903 D'Bridge 4
- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6ab09105
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Answered
- 2026-09-21 02:14 UTC by SBBSecho, 4:902/26
- Robot
SBBSecho 3.37-Linux master/~3dc56fb6b5 sep 16 2026 GCC 12.2.0
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5001/100→+2s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5001/100 |
2026-09-21 02:05 UTC |
– |
FidoMail 97f43bf5 |
| 2 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-09-21 02:05 UTC |
+2s |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 04:06 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 4 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 03:09 UTC |
+1h 3m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
Raw Via lines
2:5001/100@fidonet @20260921.020553.UTC FidoMail 97f43bf5
2:5020/715 @20260921.020555.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20260921.040617 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.030900.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
4:902/26→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
4:902/26 |
2026-09-21 02:10 UTC |
– |
SBBSecho 3.37-Linux master/~3dc56fb6b5 |
| 2 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 04:11 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-21 03:13 UTC |
+1h 3m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
Raw Via lines
4:902/26 @20260921.021013.UTC SBBSecho 3.37-Linux master/~3dc56fb6b5
2:292/854 @20260921.041114 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.031359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
- MSGID
2:5001/100@fidonet 6a9e179f
- First hop
- 2:5020/715@fidonet (rule)
- Handed over
- 2026-09-07 01:47 UTC
- Answered
- 2026-09-07 01:59 UTC by SBBSecho, 4:902/26
- Robot
SBBSecho 3.37-Linux master/6556a01a9 jul 10 2026 GCC 12.2.0
Outbound path
The Via chain the robot quoted back: every system the ping passed through on its way out.
2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 6m2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
2:5020/715 |
2026-09-07 01:47 UTC |
– |
RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl |
| 2 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-07 03:51 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-07 02:53 UTC |
+1h 6m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
Raw Via lines
2:5020/715 @20260907.014723.UTC RNtrack 2.3.0/Lnx/Perl
2:292/854 @20260907.035113 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.025359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
Return path
The answer's own Via chain: the way back from the robot to 2:5001/100, as each
relay on it recorded itself. The answer need not come back the way the ping went out, and a
relay that stamps no Via line of its own leaves no mark here, so this is the relays' account
of the trip rather than a verified route.
4:902/26→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854
| # | Node | Stamped | Elapsed | Software |
| 1 |
4:902/26 |
2026-09-07 01:55 UTC |
– |
SBBSecho 3.37-Linux master/6556a01a9 |
| 2 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-07 03:56 local |
– |
D'Bridge 4 |
| 3 |
2:292/854 |
2026-09-07 02:58 UTC |
+1h 3m |
O/T-Track+ 2.85 |
Raw Via lines
4:902/26 @20260907.015528.UTC SBBSecho 3.37-Linux master/6556a01a9
2:292/854 @20260907.035613 D'Bridge 4
2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.025859.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
Evidence
Replies
Every netmail that came back about a ping to 4:902/26, newest first, as the sending node received it. Pongs and transit notices are matched to the ping they answer.
Path quoted in this reply
2:5001/100→+1s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854
This reply's own Via lines
- 4:902/26 @20261019.022453.UTC SBBSecho 3.38-Linux master/22cbda6be5
- 2:292/854 @20261019.042606 D'Bridge 4
- 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20261019.032859.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
Software
SBBSecho 3.38-Linux master/22cbda6be5 sep 30 2026 GCC 12.2.0 --- SBBSecho 3.38-Linux
Path quoted in this reply
2:5001/100→+1s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 4m2:292/854
This reply's own Via lines
- 4:902/26 @20261005.021516.UTC SBBSecho 3.38-Linux master/22cbda6be5
- 2:292/854 @20261005.041903 D'Bridge 4
Software
SBBSecho 3.38-Linux master/22cbda6be5 sep 30 2026 GCC 12.2.0 --- SBBSecho 3.38-Linux
Path quoted in this reply
2:5001/100→+2s2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 3m2:292/854
This reply's own Via lines
- 4:902/26 @20260921.021013.UTC SBBSecho 3.37-Linux master/~3dc56fb6b5
- 2:292/854 @20260921.041114 D'Bridge 4
- 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260921.031359.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
Software
SBBSecho 3.37-Linux master/~3dc56fb6b5 sep 16 2026 GCC 12.2.0 --- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
Path quoted in this reply
2:5020/715→2:292/854→+1h 6m2:292/854
This reply's own Via lines
- 4:902/26 @20260907.015528.UTC SBBSecho 3.37-Linux master/6556a01a9
- 2:292/854 @20260907.035613 D'Bridge 4
- 2:292/854@Ward_Dossche @20260907.025859.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
Software
SBBSecho 3.37-Linux master/6556a01a9 jul 10 2026 GCC 12.2.0 --- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux